Peloton filed a lawsuit against Flywheel, claiming the company infringed on Peloton’s patent with their “FLY Anywhere” screen according to CNBC.

According to the suit that was filed today, Peloton is “claiming Flywheel infringed upon Peloton’s patents, “by creating a copycat of the Peloton Bike experience called the “FLY Anywhere” that, among other things, detects, synchronizes and compares the ride metrics of remote users on a graphical user interface,“. The suit was filed in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Marshall Division.

Since its launch, Peloton has grown its subscription member base to 600,000 and $300 million in revenue. Its business is targeted toward the at-home cycling enthusiast and selling stationary bikes.  Users can stream live or on-demand classes from home. The screen on the bike shows the rider’s output in (watts), speed, cadence, resistance, and other riders doing the same class. Riders and instructors can interact with other riders from around the world, see how they are doing, send them messages, and chat all using the Peloton’s 22-inch HD touchscreen.

Flywheel is largly a studio-based model. They launched their FLY Anywhere home platform back in November of last year and now they are stepping into Peloton’s turf.

At an interview last December, CEO John Foley said he wasn’t concerned about competition in the stationary cycling space. However, there seems to be a lot more than pure competition and there seems to be more drama into this. According to the report, the lawsuit claims that Flywheel received proprietary information from Peloton via Michael Milken.

During an invitation-only J.P. Morgan investor conference, Foley allegedly spoke to Milken about potentially investing in Peloton. In the conversation, the suit alleges, “Milken held himself out to Foley as an interested, potential investor in Peloton and pushed for information on topics including Peloton’s future business plans and strategy, and how or whether Peloton could protect its intellectual property and exclude others from the at-home cycling business.”


If Peloton is starting to feel some pressure from the competition, it will be interesting to see if they go after other indoor cycling companies. Zwift recently invested in VirtuPros, and indoor cycling company that makes smart bikes. Now probably you and me can all argue that these bikes aren’t even similar. The VirtuPros is a smart bike that can simulate terrains, ERG Mode and has an open platform. It’s geared toward cyclists and triathletes not the spin class fans.

Companies will fight for their patents. That’s how they ensure consistent growth and keep a tight grip on the market.

I am not a lawyer or even close to understanding how patent law works but I think you can argue that some of the functionalities you see on Zwift are somewhat similar to what’s on the Peloton platform.

Peloton currently is showing no sign of slowing down.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


  • “detects, synchronizes and compares the ride metrics of remote users on a graphical user interface”? They can not Patent something thats been in the market for over 20 years. Computrainer & Tacx were both doing this long before Peloton existed…looks to be a really thin case on a patent that was not properly researched.

    • They apparently do. Researching their patent and this is some of what’s on there:
      Patent# US9174085B2

      12. The method of claim 11, further comprising displaying the remote user’s performance data in secondary windows via the user interface.
      13. The method of claim 12, wherein the performance data includes the remote user’s pedal cadence.
      14. The method of claim 12, wherein the performance data includes the remote user’s power output.
      15. The method of claim 12, wherein the performance data includes the remote user’s heartrate.


      • After reading more on it also I think its more a case of them patenting their product in 2016 to stop a direct copy, but they can not license most of this list as its all ‘prior art’ that everyone in the cycling industry know about (Computrainer for example in the late 90s). It will be this list with the change that they supply real-time Video streamed fitness classes. A little bit like there are many patents for bottle openers. Its the real time streamed Video content of fitness classes that is their own method of changing the prior art enough to be their own type of bottle opener.

        • It will be a real battle to prove infringement on their patent with other cycling apps in the market but I think Flywheel has a good chance of losing this one since they are a direct competitor and look very similar to Peloton’s own platform. But if Peloton takes this against other apps, then they are just wasting their money.